This is satire right? You can take a $10,000 computer from 10 years ago and it will be MAGNITUDES worse than building a mid-range ~$1000 rig today.
$8 doesn't seem bad for one month. Could play through both South Park games and sample some of the other games to decide if you want to purchase.
Wut? The FACT is that Yuzu didn't pirate the game. The code is open source and does not do anything illegal. Nintendo going after Yuzu is like Warner Bros going after Plex. Can Plex be used for piracy? Certainly. Is that the fault or responsibility of Plex? No.
In both cases it is the user and the distributor that is partaking in illegality. Someone is hosting the rom/movie and someone is choosing to illegally download it and run it.
Are you honestly suggesting that every hacked Switch owner has a beefy PC?
@MrBaskerville
What point are you trying to make? Yuzu has no way to determine the origins of your ROM. Maybe you pirated it, maybe you dumped it yourself. Yes, TOTK being played pre-release means that was definitely piracy on the user end. But the software is emulating a Switch. If you got your hands on a TOTK cartridge before the release date, then that would not be piracy and it would run on your Switch.
It didn't have to be a failure. If they had made it on a budget similar to Remedy's Control (~$33M), then they probably would have been profitable. But when you spend $125M on a game, you damn well better make sure it appeals to a lot of people and that they buy it.
Go play Warhawk, it's still just as good as you may or may not remember.
That being said I'm not making a judgement call. I refuse to say one is better than the other, because they're very different.
@zaanan
In case you didn't know this game is no longer top down like the first one. Full on 3rd person shooter. I say that to say, no, it does not have any kind of local multiplayer.
@ Zeke
I get where you're coming from. Besides PS+ and Prime (for the shipping) I haven't had any subscription for 5+ years.
It existing as an option does not force you to subscribe.
Lol. This is like when people claim Xbox is more profitable than PS while ignoring that the Bungie acquisition comes out of PS financials (and they still turn a profit) while all the Xbox acquisitions come from the MS wallet.
No. It's unethical to withhold the information from the public.
If someone from the Pentagon illegally leaks information to a journalist and they publish it, then the journalist has done nothing wrong.
Show me on the doll where GaaS touched you. Seriously though, you download the game and play it. How does it selling skins affect your experience?
Which makes sense given that this is a bunch of former BF developers.
You don't need to play it. Just go watch Digital Foundry's video. They talk about how the CPU is being used for graphical effects that would not have been possible on jaguar cores.
I agree. After a few matches on PS5 I switched over to play on PC. Been fine ever since.
@ Obscure
Oh I see. I'm sure you're equally peeved that since Gold got rebranded as GP Core they shouldn't be combining those numbers either, right? Riiiight?
$11 in the year 2000 is $20 today adjusted for inflation.
Oh yeah? You getting Dualsense haptics and triggers?
"there are only a handful of current gen games on ps5 worth owning"
And there are even less of them on PC